Sr.No. |
CSS |
CSS3 |
1 |
CSS is capable of positioning texts and objects. |
On the other hand, CSS3 is capable of making the web page more attractive and takes less time to create. CSS3 is backward compatible with CSS. |
2 |
Responsive designing is not supported in CSS |
CSS3 is the latest version, hence it supports responsive design. |
3 |
CSS cannot be split into modules. |
Whereas CSS3 can be breakdown into modules. |
4 |
Using CSS, we cannot build 3D animation and transformation. |
But in CSS3 we can perform all kinds of animation and transformations as it supports animation and 3D transformations. |
5 |
CSS is very slow as compared to CSS3 |
Whereas CSS3 is faster than CSS. |
6 |
In CSS we have set of standard colors and it uses basic color schemes only. |
Whereas CSS3 has a good collection of HSL RGBA, HSLA, and gradient colors. |
7 |
In CSS we can only use single text blocks. |
But in CSS3 we can use multi-column text blocks |
8 |
CSS does not support media queries. |
But CSS3 supports media queries |
9 |
CSS codes are not supported by all types of modern browsers. |
Being the latest version, CSS3 codes are supported by all modern browsers. |
10 |
In CSS, designers have to manually develop rounded gradients and corners. |
But CSS3 provides advanced codes for setting rounded gradients and corners |
11 |
There is no special effect like shadowing text, text animation, etc. in CSS. The animation was coded in jQuery and JavaScript. |
SS3 has many advance features like text shadows, visual effects, and a wide range of font styles and colors. |
12 |
In CSS, the user can add background colors to list items and lists, set images for the list items, etc. |
Whereas CSS3 list has a special display property defined in it. Even list items also have counter reset properties. |
13 |
CSS was developed in 1996. |
CSS3 is the latest version of CSS and was released in 2005. |
14 |
CSS is memory intensive. |
CSS3 memory consumption is low as compared to CSS. |